Posts Tagged religion

‘Lost’ — The Last Rites

No doubt every fan of “Lost” who saw the finale last night has an opinion on what they saw. Some people loved it, others hated it, and many more were somewhat ambivalent about it. I am one who falls into that last category.

I didn’t hate it, but I didn’t exactly love it either, although I was greatly moved by the reuniting of lost loves with their shared memories. That was a masterful payoff for the viewers who have been so heavily invested in the lives of those who inhibited the mysterious island for the last six years.

But, in the end, I feel that the “sideways time line as purgatory” reveal was a bit of a cop out. Indeed, one can imagine concluding any number of shows the same way—a bunch of characters meeting up in the afterlife and chewing the fat over old times and shared experiences before “moving on” to their final destination. Thus, while the ending allowed for the main cast of characters to attain ultimate closure, it felt completely detached from the events that were rapidly rushing to a conclusion on the island-based half of the show.

Indeed, I felt that the emotional power of the afterlife time line (to call it what it is) overwhelmed the rest of the show, making the final battle, the final flight, and the final sacrifice all seem rather perfunctory. It certainly made it hard to appreciate the depth of Jack’s sacrifice when you have already seen him being joyously embraced by the ones he cared for. The desperate battle for survival and the constant struggle to do the right thing that made up life on the island was overshadowed by the final group orgasm of happy reunions, and that’s a shame.

And, as many other reviewers have already pointed out, we didn’t get any closure at all relating to the true nature and origin of the island. I am a great fan of ambiguous endings. There is nothing worse than a show that tries to spoon-feed its viewers a happy ending where all the threads are tied up in a neat little bow. But, come on guys, you could have given us something! I guess, given that one of the central conceits of the show was the blatant and incessant non-answering of questions revolving around the central mystery of the island, we should have expected something like this, but it’s still deeply unsatisfying all the same. It certainly leads to the suspicion that the writers really could not figure out a decent back story for the island and decided to take the easy way out.

All in all, I think it’s disappointing that they didn’t try harder to tie the ultimate ending in with the history, nature, and fate of the island. And there was at least one way they could have done that without losing the power of those moments of joint recollection.

The show had already established the power of the island to influence and alter the course of people’s lives, no matter where or when they lived. We saw how Jacob harnessed that power in a life-long effort to draw suitable candidates for his replacement to the island. So, why not have Hurley—as the new “number one’—make use of that vast power to bring about a happy ending for his friends? The alternative time line could be exactly that, an alternative reality—a parallel Earth—in which the Oceanic flight 815 did not crash, but one that Hurley can use power of the island to influence. 

The alternative-reality characters would still be the flawed, purposeless losers that Jacob had sought out, but instead of being transformed by living on the island, Hurley could have “rescued” them by using the island’s power to transfer the memories of their parallel selves into their minds. Thus their lives would be transformed for the better as their shared memories awoke, and their fate would remain coupled with the events as they had played out on the island. It is certainly something a character like Hurley would have done given the chance as protector and guardian of the island.

As a footnote, in a bizarre coincidence, “Lost” was not the only major drama on TV to conclude this weekend by revealing that the show was, at least in part, set in a kind of afterlife purgatory. The BBC drama “Ashes to Ashes,” along with it’s prequel “Life On Mars” concluded a five year arc Friday night with the revelation that all the characters in the show are dead too, and living out their daily lives in a kind of policeman’s version of purgatory, where they can work out their issues in preparation for moving on to their final destination. The ending does make more sense for the British pair of show, because the two stars involved were victims of serious head trauma and were assumed to be hovering between life and death, but it’s still a fascinating coincidence that two completely unrelated teams of writers should have plumped for exactly the same final conclusion of their show several years before they ended on the same weekend.

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

The Ineptness of Guardian Angels

Until the last couple of years, I didn’t know an awful lot about the Catholic faith. Even though I had grown up in an area of Glasgow that had a Catholic secondary school (the British equivalent of high school), my experiences of Christianity were almost entirely Protestant in nature. And when I first came to America, it was the Protestant strain of Christianity that dominated the national media’s coverage of religion, except when it involved priests raping little boys, of course.

But then a new radio station hit the airwaves here in Austin, Texas. Relevant Radio came to town, and it turned out to be every bit as rabidly right-wing as the other Christian radio stations. But it was an interesting change from the usual religious fare on local radio, and I still tune in once in a while, when I am driving around town.

One thing that I quickly noticed is how steeped in superstition Catholic conservatives are. While fundamentalists can be just as credulous when it comes to things like demons, evil spirits, and witchcraft (hence the pogrom against poor old Harry Potter), they tend to stop short of integrating specific superstitions into their religious doctrine. Catholics, on the other hand, are quite comfortable doing it, with the cult they have built up surrounding Mary being the prime example, to the point of claiming that she was “immaculately conceived.”  There is no end to the number of apparitions, divine miracles and interventions attributed to her over the years.

Just the other day I was listening to a priest responding to a question about guardian angels, another superstition they have wrapped into official dogma of the Catholic church. A listener had asked whether it was just believers who had a guardian angel watching over them, or everybody. The priest obviously took this question very seriously, because he had taken the time to look up all kinds of Catholic texts to find the answer. And it was clear from the two or three examples he quoted that the correct answer, according to Catholic dogma anyway, was that only believers have guardian angels.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

1 Comment

The Convenience of Paradoxical Thinking

One of the aspects of Christianity (at least the more fundamentalist version thereof) that has long puzzled me, is the way it claims that the human race, is both the pinnacle of God’s creation, worthy of God’s love and total devotion, and the vilest thing to have ever walk the face of the Earth, the lowest of the low, worthy only of the cruelest of fates and eternal damnation.

I am not alone in noticing this paradox.  As Christopher Hitchens says, at the beginning of chapter six of his book “God Is Not Great,”

There is a central paradox at the core of religion. The three great monotheisms teach people to think abjectly of themselves, as miserable and guilty sinners prostrate before an angry and jealous god who, according to discrepant accounts, fashioned them either out of dust and clay or a clot of blood. [...] On the other hand, and as if by way of compensation, religion teaches people to be extremely self-centered and conceited. It assures them that god cares for them individually, and it claims that the cosmos was created with them specifically in mind.

Of course, religion’s paradoxical view of humankind’s position in the universe is extremely useful to its adherents. It allows them to assume the aura of extreme abasement and modesty when claiming to be doing things in “God’s name,” while simultaneously allowing them to attack naturalism and atheism as concepts which reduce human beings to nothing better than unthinking farmyard animals.

Since, as unsaved human beings, non-Christians are supposedly deserving to a fate far worse than the one the lowliest of farmyard animals will suffer, it’s hard no to laugh when non-believers are attacked in this manner. I guess using their twisted logic, a special place in Hell is a step up in importance from simple oblivion… somehow.

, , , ,

No Comments

The Mind Boggles

One of my favorite webs site for whiling away a few minutes between tasks is WordSplay, which is by far the best Boggle site I have seen on the Interwebs. Written completely in JavaScript, it has a 4×4 board and a 5×5 board to choose from, and once your three minutes of furious typing is up, your score is tallied and displayed along with all the others who competed in that round.

I am at somewhat of a disadvantage since I’m a hunter and pecker, not a touch-typist, but I can still win the odd 4×4 round when the word count is low (and the real pros aren’t racking up massive totals). As for 5×5, well, if I get on the first page of the scoreboard I am doing well!

One of the interesting aspects of the site is the number of people who use their screen name (which can be changed at any time) to make a political statement. Hence you get the Obama supporters, and the Obama haters, and a fair number of people proclaiming “Jesus Loves You”, “Jesus Is Lord”, or “U Have a Friend In Jesus” and so on. I must admit that occasionally they would prompt me to change my screen name to something like “Jesus, Your Imaginary Friend” — a little petty I know, but it used to irritate me that they would pester the rest of us with their proselytizing when all we want to do is play Boggle for a few minutes. In the end I just used the screen name “Above Us Only Sky” and left it at that.

Another cool aspect of the site is that you can form teams with other players—particularly fun if you’re not one a regular high scorer. Since I started playing the 5×5 board, I have noticed that it’s the religious teams that get the most traction, followed by the usual pro/anti-Obama teams. Thus you will almost always see a “Team JesusIssovereign” (of course it’s got to be more explicit than “Team Christian”), a “Team Atheist,” a “Team Jewish,” and even a “Team Catholic.” Thus the religious divide that exists in society reaches even into Boggleland! The one notable exception is the regular “Team Pirates, Aarrgh!” because you can never have too many pirates playing Boggle. :-)

, , ,

No Comments

Restore Stephen Baldwin, My Ass

This has got to be the most tone deaf appeal for charity I have seen in a long, long time:

Stephen Baldwin of the famous “Baldwin Brothers” Hollywood clan is a veteran actor who has starred in over 60 films and TV shows. He is no stranger to the Hollywood life of glitz, glamour and the public eye.

In 2003, he had an experience that changed his life forever. He became Born Again Christian, giving his life to Jesus Christ. Over the next few years, he became very vocal about his faith, using his spotlight to boldly preach the gospel. However, because of this convictions it has caused him the loss of many jobs and the most recently, a highly publicized bankruptcy.

He has been publicly ridiculed and insulted by people who think that he has been abandoned by God. A simple search through the internet will reveal that people not only mock Stephen, but mock God.

In response to this (with the permission of Stephen’s ministry President Daniel Southern) we have established RestoreStephenBaldwin.org. A privately funded and managed website. Our vision is to see Stephen Baldwin publicly restored in front of millions. Stephen’s platform will increase allowing him to reach even more people with the Gospel and God will get all of the glory. Publicly.

And just in case you think this is a joke, they have put together a very detailed FAQ to explain how serious they are about this:

Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

No Comments

Question of the Day

Is telling a believer that their God does not exist any worse than telling an atheist that God loves them?

, , ,

2 Comments

Are Religious People More Charitable than Non-Believers?

I was watching “The Great God Debate” featuring atheist Christopher Hitchens and the Jewish Rabbi David Wolpe on YouTube the other day. Like many of the encounters Hitchens has with religious leaders, the debate was spirited and quite enjoyable, particularly because Wolpe isn’t your typical fire-breathing religious fundamentalist.

One topic that came up—and invariably does in these debates—was the issue of charitable giving, and the fact that religious people give appreciably more of their time and money to charity than secular people.

While Hitchens attempted to rebut that assertion by pointing out that religious charitable giving often comes with strings attached—i.e. as part of some type of evangelical outreach to win more converts—I think the basic truth that religious people give more is hard to deny. Hitches also talked about the Richard Dawkins Foundation’s effort to raise money for survivors of the Haitian earthquake which, while laudable, but doesn’t begin to cover the shortfall.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

1 Comment

Federal Judge Rules National Day of Prayer Unconstitutional

Well I never.

(CNN) — A federal judge on Thursday struck down the federal statute that established the National Day of Prayer, ruling that it violates the constitutional ban on government-backed religion.

“[I]ts sole purpose is to encourage all citizens to engage in prayer, an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function,” a Wisconsin judge wrote in the ruling, referring to the 1952 law that created the National Day of Prayer.

“In this instance, the government has taken sides on a matter that must be left to individual conscience,” wrote the judge, Barbara B. Crabb.

So, in the time it took for me to (almost) finish my taxes, the story changes from the silly email rumor that President Obama has canceled the National Day of Prayer to a federal court ruling that declares the 1952 National Day of Prayer statute unconstitutional!

Now, nothing is actually going to happen between now and May 6th since the statute will stand until all avenues of appeal are exhausted, and President Obama has already stated that he will be issuing the proclamation on scheduled, but this is going to drive the conservative Christians to apoplexy nonetheless.

Should be fun.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

1 Comment

Obama Cancels National Day of Prayer?

Er, actually no he didn’t. Despite what the conservative Christian hysteria machine would have you believe, on May 6th, the National Day of Prayer will be recognized by President Obama by issuing a proclamation just as all his predecessors have done since its inauguration in 1952.

All Obama has done is decided against holding a prayer service in the White House on that day, an event was only started under the last president as a rather empty political gesture to his evangelical Christian constituency. And, by the way, he didn’t hold an NDP service in the White House last year either, so it’s not like this should be shocking news to anyone.

That decision President Obama made last year made Shirley Dobson cry:

Naturally, prominent evangelicals, including National Day of Prayer Task Force Chairman Shirley Dobson, and her husband, Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, expressed disappointment in Obama’s decision.

“At this time in our country’s history, we would hope our president would recognize more fully the importance of prayer,” Shirley Dobson said in a statement.

I suspect that in the three weeks between now and May 6th, the outrage of the religious right will serve to prove that the President did the right thing by returning to the usual practice of just issuing a proclamation. Thanks mostly to the efforts of Dobson’s sectarian NDP Task Force, the day, and the celebration of the day had become little more than a political football in the hands of the religious right.

Conservative Christians everywhere will be able to pray to their heart’s content on May 6th (or any other day), whether or not the current president panders to their wishes.

Update: Corrected post to reflect that Dobson’s quote was actually made before last year’s NDP.

, , , ,

No Comments

National Day of Prayer Hijacking, Part 2

As if there needs to be any more evidence to prove that under Shirley Dobson’s leadership, the National Day of Prayer has been hijacked to serve the partisan political purposes of Christian conservatives, I just came across this little Q&A on the Focus on the Family web site:

Question

When is the National Day of Prayer? Where can I get more information about the event?

Answer

The 2010 National Day of Prayer (NDP) will take place on Thursday, May 6. Shirley Dobson continued as Chairman of the NDP Task Force; Dr. Franklin Graham is the Honorary Chairman for 2010.  

The National Day of Prayer has its own Web site (www.nationaldayofprayer.org) that offers information about how the day is observed across the United States.

The first paragraph is highly misleading. There is no Honorary Chairman for the National Day of Prayer. It is a position that has been created solely by the NDP Task Force and thus Graham is only the Honorary Chairman for the National Day of Prayer Task Force’s observance of the National Day of Prayer, which is a completely different matter.

The second paragraph is completely untrue. The domain name nationaldayofprayer.org is owned by the “National Day of Prayer Committee” which operates out of the same building as “Focus on the Family” and runs the NDP Task Force solely for the benefit of conservative “Bible-believing” Christians. The site has no information about how the day is observed across the United States unless you happen to be a right-wing moral majority type of Christian.

I filled out the feedback form to (politely) point out the erroneous information in the answer.  It will be very interesting to see if they do anything about it.

, ,

No Comments