Orson Scott Card Joins the National Organization for Marriage


Well that’s the final nail in the coffin.  I remember discovering Card’s famous first novel, Ender’s Game, and being completely taken with it.  On the strength of that and his other early efforts, I read all five books of his Homecoming Saga, the first few books of The Tales of Alvin Maker, and the sequels to Ender’s Game.  I knew nothing of his religious or politics views, and since they didn’t seem to be influencing the quality or tone of his writing, I had no interest in finding out what they were.

But, as seems to happen with all too many authors, when they get a wee bit famous, they start injecting all kinds of personal views and prejudices into their stories.  I guess they feel that they have earned that right, and I suspect that editors tend to have less control over the content and tenor of their prized authors’ later novels.

I remember slogging my way through Terry Goodkind’s marathon Sword of Truth fantasy series a couple of years ago.  As with many such series, the first few books were entertaining and engaging, but then the pace of the action began to slow and I found myself skipping whole pages as the same plots and conversations were rehashed over and over again.  Then in book eight, Naked Empire, the hero of the story saves a bunch of pacifists from themselves, but not before he holds up the action and gives a chapter-long speech on the evils of pacifism.

Now, I’m not a pacifist.  If a nation is under attack from an aggressor, I believe they have the right to defend themselves.  But the last thing I need when reading a fantasy novel is a  twenty-odd page diatribe against pacifism just because the author has an axe to grind.  Nothing turns me off more.

Anyway, back to Orson Scott Card.  It was when reading the books in the Ender series when I noticed things starting to go downhill.  The sequel to Ender’s Game, Speaker for the Dead, was okay, but Xenocide began to get a little preachy, and I found Children of the Mind unbearable and couldn’t finish it.

That was around the time I discovered that Card was a Mormon (no big deal) and a social conservative (a slightly bigger deal), but since I had already been turned off by the failing quality of his work, I had no further interest in reading anything more of his anyway.

Then I read Ender’s Game again, as part of a reading group, and it turned out to be an interesting exercise.  This time I was fully aware of Card’s politics, and was surprised how much of his personal beliefs can be found in the novel now that I knew what to look for.  Knowing that Card was, and still is, an enthusiastic backer of Bush’s misadventure in Iraq certainly shed new light on the militaristic nature of Ender’s training, not forgetting that he is a very young child at the time.  Now there is no reason why an author should not create such a setting for their novel and it may not be any reflection of the author’s personal views or prejudices, but I have little doubt that in Orson Scott Card’s case, it is.

Of course, now that Card has fully allied himself with the religious wingnuts in their ridiculous effort to “defend marriage from the gays,” I have absolutely no inclination to contribute further to the coffers of Mr. Card by buying any more of his books.

, , , ,

  1. #1 by Anoneist at May 12th, 2009

    As much as I would like to go back and re-read Card’s books as well to see what irrational drivel he slid in there, I can’t do it without vomiting all over the place so my doctor recommended I give him up. No problem there, of course.

    The sad part is that when I have kids, I’d love to share with them all the authors that got me started on sci-fi. In his case however, I don’t know if I can do it in good conscience.

    Here’s something he wrote that blew my mind, having previously considered him a thoughtful, intelligent, rational human being: http://mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/orson_scott_card/?id=3237

  2. #2 by Robert at May 12th, 2009

    I shared your enjoyment of Ender’s Game, and your incredulity and disgust as Card’slatterly bigoted views. But I can’t help wondering whether its not a case of Card injecting those views into Ender’s Game, but of you doing it for him!

    For me, Ender’s Game is about paradoxes and moral dilemmas. The art is precisely in the way he teases out those impossible choices: between the group and the individual; between war and peace. The choices made by the characters are not always the right ones.

    The tradgey of Orson Scott Card, if there is one, is that he has abandoned the subtlety, and empathy of Ender’s Game, for a rigid, revealed worldview.

  3. #3 by Rational Dreamer at May 19th, 2009

    Robert, I agree that I was probably looking at the novel from a more subjective viewpoint the second time around. As I said in the post, it’s certainly possible that none of Card’s political prejudices influenced the story, but, on that second reading, I just found unlikely.

    Perhaps that’s why I hate spoilers with a passion. I love nothing more than to watch a good movie or TV show, or read a good book knowing nothing about it beforehand.

    I guess this is a case where even knowing about the author’s personal beliefs can be considered a spoiler, in that perhaps they did color my impression of the book a second time around. If true, then that’s my loss.

(will not be published)
  1. No trackbacks yet.